Yes to green energy

NO to Rosefield Solar Farm

“We are all in favour of green energy. However, what is being proposed at Rosefield is the mass destruction of farmland for minor, inefficient, energy gains motivated by quick profits for multinationals and wealthy individuals. It is opportunism, not sustainability.”

Claydons Solar Action Group

Yes to green energy

NO to Rosefield Solar Farm

“We are all in favour of green energy. However, what is being proposed at Rosefield is the mass destruction of farmland for minor, inefficient, energy gains motivated by quick profits for multinationals and wealthy individuals. It is opportunism, not sustainability.”

Claydons Solar Action Group

DCO Scoping Report submitted by Rosefield

Pre-Application - Environmental Impact Assessment sent to the Secretary of State on 13 November 2023.

This link will take you to the Planning Inspectorate portal, and here you will be able to see all the information that relates to Rosefield. As this scheme moves forward this is where you will be able to find everything.

Planning Application - Statera Battery Storage

Sent to the Aylesbury Vale Planning 18 December 2023.

This link will take you to the Buckinghamshire Council Planning portal, and here you will be able to see all the information that relates to the Battery Storage proposal.

Greg Smith MP

I stand alongside local residents in opposing the 2,100 acre Rosefield Solar proposal in the Claydons. It is totally wrong to take this volume of land from food production, displacing tenant farmers who have farmed this land for generations and devastating our beautiful Buckinghamshire countryside that powers the tourism economy. It’s also totally confused science as 2,000 acres of solar only powers around 50,000 homes on current usage, whilst small modular reactors need just 2 football pitches and power a million homes - there is just no case for ground based solar.

Greg Smith, MP

Who are we?

The Claydons Solar Action Group (CSAG) is a collective of concerned residents from the local villages affected by the Rosefield Solar Farm proposal. The 'farm'  is to be located on 2,100 acres of agricultural land on the Claydon Estate - the ancestral home of the Verney family for over 400 years. This land is currently farmed by 3 tenant farmers who will lose all or some of their livelihoods if this proposal goes ahead, and will also be a threat to local jobs. Our farming industry plays a vital role in our long-term national food security, and farming and the countryside, are important parts of our daily lives in this part of rural Buckinghamshire.

Villages affected: Botolph Claydon, East Claydon, Middle Claydon, Calvert, Quainton, Granborough and Hogshaw plus Steeple Claydon, Edgcott and the small market town of Winslow in Buckinghamshire.

Our key concerns

Sheer Size

Visual Impact

Solar inefficiency

LOSS OF HABITAT

LOSS OF AMENITY

LOSS OF TENANT FARMER'S LIVELIHOODS & over 100 local jobs under threat

Loss of Food Producing Land

MORE CONSTRUCTION & DAMAGE ON TOP OF HS2 & EWR

Traffic Impact and poor country roads

acres (875 hectares) on agricultural land

Solar panels (560 watts)
Square miles
Football pitches
Miles of security fencing & CCTV

Loss of food producing land

There is a clear policy conflict within government which seeks to protect and enhance our domestic production to maintain food security and be more self-sustainable but is encouraging the growth of renewable energy on valuable farmland and areas of high amenity. We are concerned about this considerable loss of land and inadequate policies to protect it, particularly in the light of the Russia/Ukraine war and the impact it is having with global food shortages and food prices.

We believe that no large scale solar plant should be approved for development on greenfield land until the collective impact on the environment, biodiversity and food security is fully understood.

We could achieve national solar targets by having a roof top solar policy for houses/commercial buildings and utilisation of brownfield sites just like other countries do.

Loss of tenant farmers

"The Tenant Farmers Association of England and Wales (TFA) is pleased to be supporting Claydons Solar Action Group in opposing proposals for the 2,100 acre Rosefield Solar Farm. This scheme is wholly contrary to public policy and is not in the public interest. If approved, the project will remove a considerable area of  versatile agricultural land needed to ensure that we are meeting our food security and food self-sufficiency targets as a nation. Additionally, if accepted, it would involve the loss of a large area of land from the tenanted sector of agriculture which would be contrary to the Government's policy of seeking to ensure that we at least maintain the tenanted sector at its current level to assist with new entrants, progressing and developing farmers. We will be joining with Claydons Solar Action Group to encourage the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to reject these proposals."  TFA Chief Executive George Dunn.

One farm lost, one farm reduced by half that specialises in rare breeds, and one farm of national importance reduced and is a local tourist attraction. Over 100 local jobs could GO!

Solar inefficiency

UK Ground-based solar is inefficient! University of Sheffield research has proven solar panels to only be 11% efficient in the UK - due to the variable climate. This forces ground-based solar farms to sprawl across vast tracts of land to generate the amount of electricity of alternatives, such as wind and small modular reactors.

Solar energy is presented as ‘clean’ energy but while the electricity generated by the panels is free from direct carbon emissions, the manufacture, transport and disposal of solar panels is far from clean. Fossil fuel energy is still used to make the panels, particularly the glass element, and the environmental impact of transport to Europe, mostly from China, is enormous.

Panels have a commercial life of no more than 20 years, so most will be replaced during the 40-year lease of the land. Used solar panels are generally discarded into landfill, there is no recycling programme and no incentive for companies to build this into their business models.

Visual impact

Imagine solar panels mounted up to 3.5m high spread across 2,100 acre site of open countryside adjacent to many local villages who will see them from quite a distance. There will also be 2.5m high security fencing, CCTV and security lighting to 3.5m around the solar panel fields. Added to that will be inverters and transformers dotted across the site in large unsightly containers emitting significant and constant noise. Given the unsightly nature of this industrial landscape Rosefield Solar Farm has had to take appropriate mitigation measures. Many of the so-called screening enhancements will take up to 15 years and beyond to provide a decent level of screening, but this misses the point as the character and beauty of much of this countryside is the long lightly undulating open vista that does NOT need enhancing or require 'improved' footpaths.

With the NEARBY development of the now defunct HS2 and East West Rail this solar scheme will damage the habitat even further which is vital for our local wildlife.

Loss of amenity

If you enjoy walking, cycling, running or riding through the countryside, and experiencing the health and well-being that it brings, then imagine the impact of being surrounded by solar panels and associated equipment on public rights of way and quiet country roads. Public rights of way may be moved or closed during the construction phase, which could be two years.

many people travel to the area to get away from the hustle and bustle of life to enjoy the open space and countryside - something that was very important during COVID-19.

Loss of habitat

The Claydon Estate has maintained and managed the arable farmland and adjoining woodland very well for centuries. Local woodland adjoining the proposed development are classified as 'ancient woodland', many of these areas are SSSI classified, with several rare and unreplaceable species of flora and fauna. The woodlands and farmed areas next to the site and beyond, including a nature reserve, have already been impacted by HS2 and EWR, and further encroachment on the Claydon site will indeed be very, very detrimental to existing wildlife. Should the development proceed, and when existing ancient hedgerows are ripped out, watercourses filled, and the agricultural land covered with solar panels as is proposed by the developers, then this shall be catastrophic for the existing wildlife, and it would be very unlikely to ever recover.

CSAG are asking locals to collaborate with us by doing a wildlife watch in the area. Click for more information: Wildlife in and around Rosefield Solar Farm

Both animals and plant life found around these ancient woodlands have a symbiotic relationship with each other and rely on both woodland and the open arable land adjoining the woodland to sustain their own particular species requirements.

Further road disruption & damage

The construction phase could take up to 2 years with all HGVs, abnormal loads and workers’ construction traffic coming through some local villages. This will create added noise, pollution, and damage to roads and associated verges, as well as extra risk for pedestrians, cyclists and horse-riders. It is also likely to disturb the bio-diversity down more rural side lanes.

The construction plan is not known at present but due to the nature of the location, it will be inevitable that some roads will be too narrow. Many special traffic measures may need to be added which may include yet more road closures.

This proposal will further batter our beaten roads and verges in the construction process after having to tolerate HS2 and East West Rail construction for the past few years.

Scroll to Top